Diatoms in Drift – A Preliminary Study in Northern Oman

Reginald Victor, Neelam Sherwani

Abstract


This first paper on the freshwater diatoms of Oman records 49 species belonging to 17 genera in the stream drift of 13 man-made irrigation channels known as aflaj. The number of species in each genus ranged from 1 to 7.  Pennales were represented by 16 genera and 47 species while centrales had two species in one genus. The number of species drifting in each aflaj ranged from 1 to 15. Only one species occurred in 59% of the localities sampled; two species occurred in 29%; and the occurrence of other species ranged from 6 to 24%. Although all aflaj originated from springs in the northern mountain region with the same underlying geology, there were differences in the surface water chemistry, but the diatom assemblages could not be characterised based on the physical and chemical parameters. All aflaj investigated largely satisfied the standards of drinking and irrigation water quality in Oman. Therefore, the diatom assemblages reported here can be considered as those of clean water. Similarity coefficients based on diatom flora indicated that all aflaj were significantly dissimilar. The need for further studies on the freshwater microflora of Oman is emphasized.

Keywords


Diatoms; Drift; Aflaj; Northern Oman; Similarity Coefficient

References


Al Lamki, M.S.S. and Terken, J.J.M. 1996. The Role of Hydrogeology in Petroleum Development Oman. GeoArabia 1: 495-510.

Brittain, J. E. and Eckland, T. R. 1988. Invertebrate drift—a review. Hydrobiologia 166: 77-93.

Beyene, A.; Addis, T.; Kifle, D.; Legesse, W.; Kloos, H. and Triest, L. 2009. Comparative study of diatoms and macroinvertebrates as indicators of severe water pollution: Case study of the Kebena and Akaki rivers in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Ecological Indicators 9: 381-392.

Blinn, D.W. 1993. Diatom community structure along physicochemical gradients in saline lakes. Ecology 74: 1246–1263.

Eaton, A. D.; Clesceri, L. S.; Greenberg, A. E.; and Franson, M. A. H. 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC,. 1325 pages.

Environmental Agency, 2007. Common freshwater diatoms of Britain and Ireland – An interactive identification key. CD –ROM. UK. Environmental Agency (2007)..

Feio, M.J.; Almeida, S.F.P.; Craveiro, S.C. and Calado, A.J. 2007. Diatoms and macroinvertebrates provide consistent and complementary information on environmental quality. Archiv fur Hydrobiologie. 168: 247–258.

Feio, M.J.; Almeida, S.F.P.; Craveiro, S.C. and Calado, A.J. 2009. A comparison between biotic indices and predictive models in stream water quality assessment based on benthic diatom communities. Ecological indicators 9: 497–507.

Gasse, F.; Juggins, S. and Khelifa, L.B. 1995. Diatom-based transfer functions for inferring past hydrochemical characteristics of African lakes. Palaeogeography. Palaeoclimatoogy. Palaeoecology. 117: 31–54.

Gibbins, C.; Batalla, R.J. and Vericat, C. 2010. Invertebrate drift and benthic exhaustion during disturbance: response of mayflies (Ephemeroptera) to increasing shear stress and river-bed instability. River Res. Appl. 26:499-511.

Hauer, R.F. and Lamberti, G.A. 1996. Methods in Stream Ecology. Academic Press, London. 674 pages.

John, J. 2000. A Guide to Diatoms as Indicators of Urban Stream Health. National River Health Program. Urban Sub Program, Report no. 7, Land and Water Resources Research and Development Cooperation LWRRDC Occasional Paper 14/99.

Kohler, S.L. 1985). Identification of stream drift mechanisms – an experimental and observational approach. Ecology 66: 1749–1761.

Lavoie, I.; Campeau, S.; Grenier, M. and Dillon, P.G. 2006. A diatom-based index for the biological assessment of eastern Canadian rivers: an application of correspondence analysis. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63 (8): 1793-1811.

Lavoie, I.; Campeau, S.; Darchambeau, F.; Cabana, G. and Dillon, P.J. 2008. Are diatoms good integrators of temporal variability in stream water quality? Freshwater Biology. 53(4): 827- 841.

Magurran, A.E. 2004. Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA. 256 pages.

Muller-Haeckel, A. 1971. Circadiane Periodik der Kolonisations-aktivität driftender Algen. Naturwissenschaften 58: 273-274.

Muller, K. 1974. Stream drift as a chronobiological phenomenon in running water ecosystem. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 5: 309-323.

Needham, J.G. and Needham P.R. 1962. A guide to the study of freshwater biology. Boston, WCB-Mc Graw Hill, pp.9-11.

Potapova, M. and Charles, D.F. 2007. Diatom metrics for monitoring eutrophication in rivers of the United States. Ecological Indicators 7: 48–70.

Rolland, T.; Fayolle, S.; Cazaubon, A. and Pagnetti, S. 1997. Methodical approach to distribution of epilithic and drifting algae communities in a French subalpine river: inferences on water quality assessment. Aquatic Sciences 59: 57–73

Rott, E.; Pipp, P. and Pfister, P. 2003. Diatom methods developed for river quality assessment in Austria and a cross-check against numerical trophic indication methods used in Europe. Algological Studies 110: 91–115.

Stanger, G. 1986. The hydrogeology of the Oman mountains. Ph.D. Thesis, Open University, U.K. 622 pages.

Taylor, J.C., Prygiel, J., Vosloo, A., Pieter, A. and van Rensburg, L., 2007. Can diatom-based pollution indices be used for biomonitoring in South Africa? A case study of the Crocodile West and Marico water management area. Hydrobiologia 592: 455-464.

Victor, R. and Victor, J.R. 2002. Zooplankton of an arid zone mountain reservoir in the Sultanate of Oman, Arabia. Verhandlungen der Internationalen Vereinigung für Theore-tische und Angewandte Limnologie 28: 507-512.

Victor, R. 2004. Limnology in the Sultanate of Oman. Pages 219-244, In: Gopal, B. and Wetzel, R.G. (Editors) Limnology in the Developing Countries. Vol. 4. International Association of Limnology (SIL).

Waters, T.F. 1972. The drift of stream insects. Annual Review of Entomology 17: 253-272.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

COPYRIGHT of this Journal vests fully with the National Instional Institute of Ecology. Any commercial use of the content on this site in any form is legally prohibited.