Effect of Intercropping on Soil Health and Yield Potential of Mango in Paradise Valley, East Kawlchaw, Saiha District of Mizoram, NE India

U. K. Sahoo


The effect of different intercrops on soil nutrient status, yield of mango and its biological efficiency was studied, during 2008-2013, in 10 year-old mango orchards planted at 8m x 8m spacing, in Paradise valley, East Kalcho, Saiha district of Mizoram. The intercrops in mango orchard were ginger, French bean, paddy, turmeric, roselle and maize. The results indicate that the average fruit weight was significantly higher (P<0.005) in intercrops than the sole mango crop and the average fruit weight was maximum in mango+roselle+French bean followed by mango+cowpea. The number of fruits/tree varied from 68 to 130 in different treatments. The average mango yield was higher in the intercropping systems than sole mango crop; it varied between intercrops and years, ranging from 1.89 Mg/ha (mango + pineapple) to 4.84 Mg/ha (mango + roselle + French bean). Intercropping improved the soil health by enhancing available nitrogen at 0-15 cm depth by 17.53% (mango + turmeric) to 37.64% (Mango + roselle + French bean) compared to the sole mango. Intercropping also increased the available phosphorus and potassium contents both at 0-15 and 0-30 cm soil depths. The mean mango equivalent yield was highest (6.83 Mg ha-1) in Mango+pineapple followed by Mango+roselle+French bean (6.33 Mg ha-1), Mango+cowpea (6.08 Mg ha-1) to sole mango (1.78 Mg ha-1). The Land  Equivalent  Ratio was always higher in intercropping than the sole mango and it ranged from 2.06 (Mango+pineapple) to 3.53 (Mango+cowpea). Thus, intercropping not only improved soil nutrients but also resulted in higher yield of the fruit crop.


Intercropping; Land Equivalent Ratio; Mango Equivalent; Soil Health


Abouziena, H.F.H.; El-Motty-Elham, A.Z.; Youssef, R.A. and Salah, A.F. 2010. Efficacy of intercropping mango, mandarin or Egyptian clover plants with date palm on soil properties, rhizospheremicroflora and quality and quantity of date fruits. Journal of American Science 6 (12): 230-238.

Ali, M.S.; Jha, R.C. and Sattar, A. 2008.Studies on cultivation feasibility of intercrops under mango orchard. The Asian Journal of Horticulture 3(1): 109-111.

Anonymous, 1987. Annual Report. Central Institute for Northern Plain (ICAR), Lucknow: 49-55.

Bari, M.S. and Rahim, M.A. 2010. Performance of medicinal plants under mango based multistoried agroforestry system. Journal of Agroforestry and Environment 3(2): 99-102.

Bhuva, H.P.; Katrodia, J.S.; Patel, G.L. and Chundawat, B.S. 1988. Response of intercropping on economics and effects on main crop of mango under South Gujarat condition. Acta Horticulturae 231: 316-320.

Bichel, A. 2013.Applied Soybean and Maize Residue Contributions to Soil Organic Matter in a Temperate Soybean/Maize Inter-cropping System. M.Sc Thesis. University of Waterloo, Canada. 149 pages.

Bray, R.H. and Kurtz, L.T.1945. Determination of total, organic and available form of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science 59: 39-45.

Caballero, R.; Goicoechea, E.L. and Hernaiz, P.J. 1995. Forage yields and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seeding ratios and seeding rates of vetch. Field Crops Research 41: 135-140.

Carr, P.M.; Horsley, R.D. and Poland, W.W.2004.Barley, oat, and cereal–pea mixtures as dryland forages in the northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 96(3): 677-684.

Chijioke, E.O. 1980. Impact on Soils of Fast Growing Species in Lowland Humid Tropics. Forestry Paper 21. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome. 111 pages.

Dahmardeh, M.; Ghanbari, A.; Syahsar, B.A. and Ramrodi, M. 2010. The role of intercropping maize (Zea mays L.) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) on yield and soil chemical properties. African Journal of Agricultural Research 5(8): 631-636.

Dusa, E.M. and Roman, Gh.V. 2009. Researches regarding the productivity of oat-lentil intercropping in the organic agriculture system. Research Journal of Agricultural Science 41(1): 22-26.

Dusa, E.M. and Stan, V. 2013.The effect of intercropping on crop productivity and yield quality of oat (Avena sativa L.)/grain leguminous species (Pea- Pisum sativum L., Lentil- Lens culinaris L.) cultivated in pure stand and mixture in the organic agricultural system. European Scientific Journal 9 (21): 69-78.

Ghose, S.N. 2001. Intercropping in guava orchard in watershed area. The Horticulture Journal 14(3) : 36-40.

Ghose, S.N.; Bera, K.C.; Pal, D. and Bear, P.S. 1997. Intercropping in sweet orange cv. Mosambi orchard under rainfed laterite soils. Proceeding of the National Symposium on Citriculture, Nagpur: 183-185.

Hauggaard-Nielsen, H.; Ambus, P. and Jensen, E.S. 2003. The comparison of nitrogen use and leaching in sole cropped versus intercropped pea and barley. Nutrient Cycling in Agro-ecosystems 64: 289–300.

Kannan, K. and Nambiar, K.P.P. 1976. Studies on intercropping coconut garden with annual crops. Coconut Bulletin6: 9, 1-3.

Jensen, E.S. 1996. Grain yield, symbiotic N2 fixation and inter-specific competition for inorganic N in pea-barley intercrops. Plant and Soil 182: 25– 38.

Lehmann, J.; da Silva, J.P.; Trujillo, L. and Uguen, K. 2000. Legume cover crops and nutrient cycling in tropical fruit tree production. Acta Horticulturae 531: 65-72.

Lithourgidis, A.S.; Dordas, C.A.; Damalas, C.A. and Vlachostergios, D.N. 2011. Annual intercrops:an alternative pathway for sustainable agriculture. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5: 396–410.

Nayak, M.R.; Behera, L.K.; Mishra, P.J. and Bhola, N. 2014. Economics and yield performance of some short duration fruit and medicinalcrops under agrisilvicultural system in rainfed uplands of Odisha. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 6(1): 274-278.

Nair, P.K.R. 1984. Role of trees in soil productivity and conservation. In: Soil Productivity Aspects of Agro-Forestry. The Inter-national Council for Research in Agro-Forestry, Nairobi. 85 pages.

Nair, P.K R.; Kang, B.T., and Kass, D.B.L.1995. Nutrient cycling and soil erosion control in agroforestry system. Pages 117-138, In: Juo, A.S.R. and Freed, R.D. (Editors) Agriculture and Environment: Bridging Food Production in Developing Countries. Special Publication no. 60, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI.

Page, A.L.; Miller, R.H. and Keeney, D.R. 1982. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2 (2ndedition): 903-947. Agronomy Monograph of American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI, USA.

Palm, C.A. 1995. Contribution of agroforestry trees to nutrient requirements of intercropped plants. Agroforestry Systems 30: 105-124

Papastylianou, I. 1990. Response of pure stands and mixtures of cereals and legumes to nitrogen fertilization and residual effect on subsequent barley. Journal of Agricultural Science115: 15-22.

Peoples, M.B. and Craswell, E.T. 1992. Biological nitrogen fixation: Investments, Expectations and Actual Contributions to Agriculture. Plant and Soil 141: 13-39.

Rao, M.R and Coe, R. 1992. Evaluating the results of agroforestry research. Agroforestry Today 4(1): 4-8.

Rath, S. and Swain, S.C. 2006. Performance ofintercrops in bearing mango orchards in Eastern Ghat Highland zones of Orissa. Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research & Development 21: 12-15.

Rathore, A.C.; Saroj, P.L.; Lal, H.; Sharma, N.K.; Jayaprakash, J.; Chaturvedi, O.P.; Raizada, A.; Tomar, J.M.S and Dogra, P. 2013. Performance of mango based agri-horticultural models under rainfed situation of Western Himalaya, India. Agro-forestry Systems 87: 1389-1404.

Sanginga, N. and Woomer, P.L. (Editors). 2009. Integrated Soil Fertility Management in Africa: Principles, Practices and Development Process. Tropical Soil Biology and Fertility, and Institute of the International Centre for Tropical Agriculture, Nairobi. 263 pages.

Sahoo, U.K. 2007. The agroforestry systems and practices prevailing in Mizoram. Pages 367-383, In: Puri, S. and Panwar, P. (Editors) Agroforestry Systems and Practices. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi.

Sahoo, U.K.; Vanlalhriatpuia, K.; Singh, S.L.; Upadhyaya, K.; Lalnilawma and Tawnenga. 2015. Effect of intercropping on forage yield and quality of Zea mays L. in East Kawlchaw, Saiha district of Mizoram, India. Range Management and Agroforestry36(2): 183-187.

Sharma, U.J. and Choudhury, D. 2002. Synergistic effect of high density multiple cropping on soil productivity and yield of base crop (coconut). Indian Coconut Journal 33: 18-22.

Singh, J.; Kashyap, R. and Sharma, D. P.1996. Effect of cultural practices and intercropping on growth and economic yield of mango orchard cv. Langra. Indian Journal of Horticulture 53: 290 – 294.

Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for assess-ment of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science 31: 159-160.

Swain, S.C.; Dora, D.K.; Sahoo, S.C.; Padhi, S.K. and Sanyal, D. 2012. Influence of Mango-based intercropping systems on improvement of soil health under rainfed situation. Communi-cations in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 43: 2018-2026.

Swain, S.C. 2014. Performance and profitability study of different mango based intercropping systems in Eastern Ghat high land zone of Odisha. Journal of Crop and Weed 10(2): 170-178.

Szott, L.T.; Fernandes, E.C.M. and Sanchez, P.A. 1991.Soil-plant interactions in agroforestry systems. Forest Ecology and Management 45: 127-152.

Vandermeer, J. 1989. The Ecology of Intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. Xx pages.

Vishal Nath; Das, B.; Rai, M.; Dey, P.; Kumar, S. and Kumar, M. 2003. Mango based cropping systemfor uplands of sub-humid plateau region of Eastern India. Progressive Horticulture 35: 142- 45.

Walkley, A. and Black, I.A.1934. An examination of Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29-37.

Full Text: PDF


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.

COPYRIGHT of this Journal vests fully with the National Instional Institute of Ecology. Any commercial use of the content on this site in any form is legally prohibited.